Posts: 1
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2025
Reputation:
0
I'm a long-time Veeam agent for Windows free user. Always worked when needed. When a couple of days ago Veeam prompted me to install the latest version I did so and created a new recovery usb stick when prompted to do so.
The recovery stick didn't work: no keyboard, no mouse. Found out that it's the latest Microsoft update bricking the winre environment. None of the suggested solutions worked. Veeam is silent about the problem. Waiting for a Microsoft fix.
Found Hasleo Backup. Installed it. They have their own winpe environment. It works. The backups are faster and smaller than Veeam, both full and incremental. Everything works, mounting images is easy and fast. Recovery stick offers the same interface as the full Windows environment.
How is this possible? Questions on this forum gets answered. Bugs get fixed. Where's the catch?
Posts: 97
Threads: 7
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
2
10-20-2025, 07:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2025, 07:42 AM by al3x.)
For some people the catch might be that Hasleo is a company based in China and there‘s little known about the developers themselves. But if you leave out politics, this software is a masterpiece and what they offer just works out of the box - and it’s still free!
I still believe in the good in people and in my opinion, HBS shows clearly that the developers are behind their product and really care to improve it. For me personally this weighs higher than anything else and I’m really happy to have made the switch from the competition.
Posts: 2,439
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
55
Our product development is more technology-driven, whereas our competitors are more profit-driven. Clearly, we also need revenue to sustain further product development. If you are familiar with our other products, you will find that our early products were essentially the only ones in the world when launched, whether it was EasyUEFI, WinToUSB, or BitLocker Anywhere. However, as more and more other companies introduced similar products, we also felt tremendous pressure.
The competitors have ample manpower and financial resources, yet they allocate more personnel to product promotion rather than actual R&D, because promotion can easily generate higher profits. Unlike them, we lack both funding and sufficient manpower. That's why every user who gets access to this product is fortunate—you're fortunate, and so are we.
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2025
Reputation:
0
I’d certainly pay a reasonable yearly subscription fee. Whatever helps you guys to move ahead, comfortably, seems fair?
Posts: 22
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2025
Reputation:
0
I believe they've said that part of their strategy to pull business from other options is, when a price is eventually set, to NOT charge a subscription fee and rather use a perpetual licensing strategy. That's the reason why some (many?) are using HBS instead of the software they were using before. I'm one of those people.
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2025
Reputation:
0
10-24-2025, 01:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2025, 01:31 AM by antspants.)
I’d pay, that’s all I’m saying. If I use a software on a regular basis, I’m happy to pay for it, regardless of a companies worth. It’s how I was brought up, to pay my way.
Also, I think Macrium sucks.