7 hours ago
@Froggie,
I don't do differential or incremental backup disk/partition images. I don't do scheduled Full or any other kind of scheduled images. As such, I never see that check box you have in your screenshot.
My Full manually-initiated Disk/Partition backup images are of ALL partitions. Macrium Reflect is verifying the entire image I just created from a Source internal SSD to a Target internal HDD.
If you have any doubts, head over the Macrium Reflect Forums, and ask @jphughan, their resident non-Macrium-employee expert, about what MR8 would verify. I would be most interested if you would share what he says. I have been a member of their Forums for years, though not very active in posting, but I visit the MR Forums almost daily, as you will see from my "Visits" stats on the MR Forums. I use the same name there: garioch7.
My testing results are valid on my computer with the parameters I have described above, and in earlier posts. I will be doing a manual Full Disk/Partition backup image on this coming Friday afternoon, using Macrium Reflect 8 (MR8). I will carefully note the image creation time and the image verification time, and post a screenshot that demonstrates I have no check boxes checked, because there are none there.
There does seem to be a reluctance to repeat testing with MY parameters so that they can be verified. So far, I have seen no replies that exactly duplicate my imaging parameters, so we are comparing applies to oranges.
On following Fridays, I will also records the Easeus image creation and check image times, and then a week later, carefully note the HBSP times, with photos of the disk structure and screen shots from both apps.
The purpose of my posts is NOT to disparage HBSP, with which I am pleased, but to submit some real-world testing results for consideration by the Hasleo Team. I mean NO disrespect to them, or anyone else. I have been informed that such testing is welcome here. I seek to contribute, not criticize. HBSP can only continue to evolve and be enhanced when there is meaningful, empirical tests done on how the software performs for a multitude of customers.
Thank you for this continuing discussion. It demonstrates to me that Hasleo Software is committed to enhancing their products by engaging with their customers.
Have a great day.
Regards,
Phil
I don't do differential or incremental backup disk/partition images. I don't do scheduled Full or any other kind of scheduled images. As such, I never see that check box you have in your screenshot.
My Full manually-initiated Disk/Partition backup images are of ALL partitions. Macrium Reflect is verifying the entire image I just created from a Source internal SSD to a Target internal HDD.
If you have any doubts, head over the Macrium Reflect Forums, and ask @jphughan, their resident non-Macrium-employee expert, about what MR8 would verify. I would be most interested if you would share what he says. I have been a member of their Forums for years, though not very active in posting, but I visit the MR Forums almost daily, as you will see from my "Visits" stats on the MR Forums. I use the same name there: garioch7.
My testing results are valid on my computer with the parameters I have described above, and in earlier posts. I will be doing a manual Full Disk/Partition backup image on this coming Friday afternoon, using Macrium Reflect 8 (MR8). I will carefully note the image creation time and the image verification time, and post a screenshot that demonstrates I have no check boxes checked, because there are none there.
There does seem to be a reluctance to repeat testing with MY parameters so that they can be verified. So far, I have seen no replies that exactly duplicate my imaging parameters, so we are comparing applies to oranges.
On following Fridays, I will also records the Easeus image creation and check image times, and then a week later, carefully note the HBSP times, with photos of the disk structure and screen shots from both apps.
The purpose of my posts is NOT to disparage HBSP, with which I am pleased, but to submit some real-world testing results for consideration by the Hasleo Team. I mean NO disrespect to them, or anyone else. I have been informed that such testing is welcome here. I seek to contribute, not criticize. HBSP can only continue to evolve and be enhanced when there is meaningful, empirical tests done on how the software performs for a multitude of customers.
Thank you for this continuing discussion. It demonstrates to me that Hasleo Software is committed to enhancing their products by engaging with their customers.
Have a great day.
Regards,
Phil