Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Imaging Performance Testing: MR8, ETBH, HBSP
#16
(12-28-2025, 01:46 AM)Froggie Wrote: Another factor that's never mentioned when benchmarking HDDs is the engineering model of the HDDs themselves.  With the introduction of SMR vs CMR type HDDs, WRITE speeds have taken on a different life of their own with SMR HDDs adding significant WRITE time when accessing certain sections of the drives themselves.

Adding complication to the issue is that many manufacturers never identified HDDs as far as SMR vs CMR types with little or no information available about different model drives... some still not available today.

Personally, I don't know how proper comparisons can ever be made without this type of information.

Thank you, @Froggie, for pointing that out. Therefore, we can only conduct multiple tests and take the average to reduce errors, and try to use the same testing environment as much as possible. That is why we require using the same partition and formatting the partition before generating the image file.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Imaging Performance Testing: MR8, ETBH, HBSP - by admin - 12-29-2025, 11:43 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)