Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Imaging Performance Testing: MR8, ETBH, HBSP
#17
(12-28-2025, 07:19 AM)garioch7 Wrote: With respect, there are many factors that influence write/read speeds.  I am only sharing my own results, with my own hardware.  HBSP should compare itself with real-world computers.

I compare the other two products with the exact same hardware configuration, as my comparison posts make clear.

I am actually disappointed that Hasleo, and a very senior Forum member, would seek to "explain" my testing results ...  It indicates a defensiveness that I was not expecting.

My testing is an objective, impartial analysis of how HBSP compares to the other two products I use, and have used longer than HBSP, when used on my hardware configuration.

May I respectfully suggest that instead of looking for explanations for my results, Hasleo concentrate its efforts on trying to improve the performance of HBSP on similar hardware configurations.

Respectfully submitted,
Phil

Dear Phil,

Honestly speaking, compared to V5.4, the backup performance of V5.5 has indeed regressed somewhat, and we are currently investigating the cause of this issue.

Regarding the performance differences caused by files being stored at different locations on the mechanical hard drive, this is something we recently discovered while working on improving the performance of image verification. It is indeed a real phenomenon.

Best regards,
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Imaging Performance Testing: MR8, ETBH, HBSP - by admin - 12-29-2025, 11:54 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)