Yesterday, 06:39 AM
@admin,
Thank you for that clarification. As you know, I have been testing beta versions for over a month now in my tri-weekly testing comparisons of HBSP, MR8, and 2026 ETBH. I have found the beta versions to be very stable. I am looking forward to seeing what improvements that there might be in the latest beta version when I test it this Friday.
As @Froggie stated, we are the "testers." That, in itself, is a contribution to the evolution and development of HBS. I don't normally participate in beta testing (only two other programs), but I have a lot of confidence now in HBS "beta" versions. Beta testers can get "burned" by a bad "beta" version, and I have experienced that myself, but so far, HBS beta versions have been rock solid. That is great work by the HBS Team. It testifies to a robust Quality Assurance process.
Have a great day.
Regards,
Phil
Thank you for that clarification. As you know, I have been testing beta versions for over a month now in my tri-weekly testing comparisons of HBSP, MR8, and 2026 ETBH. I have found the beta versions to be very stable. I am looking forward to seeing what improvements that there might be in the latest beta version when I test it this Friday.
As @Froggie stated, we are the "testers." That, in itself, is a contribution to the evolution and development of HBS. I don't normally participate in beta testing (only two other programs), but I have a lot of confidence now in HBS "beta" versions. Beta testers can get "burned" by a bad "beta" version, and I have experienced that myself, but so far, HBS beta versions have been rock solid. That is great work by the HBS Team. It testifies to a robust Quality Assurance process.
Have a great day.
Regards,
Phil