Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Imaging Performance Testing: MR8, ETBH, HBSP
#3
@admin,

I am happy to continue posting my tri-weekly comparison testing on my desktop platform.  I appreciate that Hasleo considers my real-world testing to be of benefit.  I wish Hasleo every success.

Yes, the Hasleo Full Image Check times are not good in the current officially-released version.  That is why I chose to use the latest beta version for my desktop testing, but used the latest official version for my laptop, the results of which I do not record.

Quote:Based on the test results you provided, Hasleo Backup Suite still has room for improvement. We will strive to make further enhancements, though this will be challenging.

I personally think that the small Hasleo Development Team has much reason to be satisfied with the enhancements and improvements made so far to such a relatively "young" product.  It took ETBH years to get their Full Check Image times to where they are now.  For years, their Check Image took 1.5 times as long as the image creation, which was also not the fastest in those days.

I salute and commend the expertise and dedication of the Hasleo Development Team.  There is always "room for improvement" with every product.  I have every confidence that the Hasleo Backup Suite Pro will continue to evolve and improve.

I thank you for your wish for a pleasant holiday, and I wish you, and the Hasleo Team, the same.

Have a great day.

Regards,
Phil
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Imaging Performance Testing: MR8, ETBH, HBSP - by garioch7 - 12-23-2025, 05:51 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)