Yesterday, 01:07 AM
(Yesterday, 12:35 AM)Dude Guyman Wrote:(10-30-2025, 05:42 PM)admin Wrote: Some users have complained that the free version doesn't support Windows Enterprise. I'm sorry, but commercial use should be paid for. Individual users generally don't use Windows Enterprise Edition anyway. Are we wrong about that?
Yes, you are. I use LTSC because it is less invasive/bloated, and not in any "commercial" way. Why or what O/S or how much I pay for it, I use is none of your f'ing business. You make and sell good software, or you don't. What/how/when/why I use it is my f'ing business alone. That said, on a free version, I am not complaining about it and would have bought a paid version...except for the "self destruct" code in it.
It is wrong for someone to describe this restriction as a bomb and self-destruction, we have been exercising restraint. Our software has been using this mechanism for more than ten years, and we have explained this restriction many times before. We have also said that the machine would be reintroduced after the paid version is released. Over the years, have you ever seen us use such a mechanism to coerce customers into upgrading in order to use our services? Users with a lifetime license still use the software normally, even if they purchased our product in 2012.