Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hasleo Backup Suite V5.5.2.1 Released!
Thanks, @Phil.
Reply
(11-12-2025, 07:36 PM)admin Wrote:
(11-12-2025, 07:06 PM)pt58 Wrote: I thought you may be interested in the results of some testing I have  performed using 3 different External USB drives.
I have done a full system backup of the same 4 partitions (100MB EFI system, 16MB MSR, 100GB Win11 C:\ and 800MB Recovery) using both Macrium V8 Free and Hasleo 5.4.2.5.
In each case I ran the backup without the verify option ticked, so I could check the actual backup time.
I then ran a manual full image verify to time how long that took in each case.
I created new tasks in each case so that the backup folder contained just the single backup image.
The USB drives I used were as follows:
External Crucial X8 2TB SSD
External Toshiba 2TB 2.5" HDD
External Seagate 4TB 2.5" HDD
Results:
Macrium V8    Backup Time        Verify Time  Size
Crucial X8      3m 09s                2m 35s        38GB
Toshiba 2TB    6m 57s                6m 53s        38GB
Seagate 4TB    6m 15s                5m 22s        38GB

Hasleo  V5425 Backup Time        Verify Time  Size
Crucial X8      1m 04s                1m 53s        35GB
Toshiba 2TB    7m 08s                19m 47s      35GB
Seagate 4TB    5m 31s                12m 01s      35GB

Conclusions.
in both Macrium and Hasleo the backup and verify times using ext SSD are considerably shorter as expected.
The verify times are roughly similar to the backup times in all cases for Macrium
The times are acceptable for Macrium using ext HDD
Hasleo produces slightly smaller backup files due to the new compression method implemented since V5
The verify times are longer than the backup times in all case for Hasleo, in one case by nearly 3 times !!
The Hasleo verify times are acceptable using an external SSD, but the times using external HDD clearly need some work to deliver an acceptable time.
Let me know if you need me to clarify any of my results, or to run further tests.

Thank you very much for providing the test results. It appears that HBS's image verification function performs poorly on mechanical hardware, and we will optimize this aspect.

It's not only a mechanical hardware issue... it may also be a structural processing issue as well.  When I open up the speed pipes a bit (PCIe v3 at 4x for NvME <about 3gB/sec>) and use a 16-threaded CPU (10th gen i7 @ 4+ghz turbo), I see REFLECT using every thread at 100% (all it can get) and HBS using only 12 of the threads at 50% each.  So it appears there are restrictions in the process as well as the slower mechanical drive issue.

Just an observation...
Reply
(Yesterday, 03:52 AM)Froggie Wrote:
(11-12-2025, 07:36 PM)admin Wrote: Thank you very much for providing the test results. It appears that HBS's image verification function performs poorly on mechanical hardware, and we will optimize this aspect.

It's not only a mechanical hardware issue... it may also be a structural processing issue as well.  When I open up the speed pipes a bit (PCIe v3 at 4x for NvME <about 3gB/sec>) and use a 16-threaded CPU (10th gen i7 @ 4+ghz turbo), I see REFLECT using every thread at 100% (all it can get) and HBS using only 12 of the threads at 50% each.  So it appears there are restrictions in the process as well as the slower mechanical drive issue.

Just an observation...

I want to know whether you are using Macrium Reflect V8 or Macrium Reflect X? Thanks.
Reply
That test was using v8.1...
Reply
I have done my weekly Friday updates, backups, and scans of both of my computers.  For the sake of simplicity, I will only deal with my desktop 2019 Dell XPS 8930 desktop computer, which is more powerful than my 2020 Dell XPS 15 7590 laptop.  The detailed specs of my desktop computer can be found in the dxdiag.txt file, which I have uploaded to my Google Drive.  The download link is: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dyIGjfq...drive_link

I am running Windows 11 Pro 25H2 (26200.7171).  Today, the usual SFC and DISM diagnostics were run monthly on the Friday after each "Patch Tuesday."  No problems were reported.

This is the template that I designed to compare the performance of Easeus Todo Backup Home [ETBH] (current version), Hasleo Backup Suite Pro [HBSP] (current version), and Macrium Reflect 8 [MR8] (the latest and probably the last version of MR8 that was superseded last year by MRX).  Next Friday, I will run ETBH, and the following Friday, I will run HBSP.  I will continue to add the results.  This Friday, I ran MR8.  I have copied the MR8 Log to my Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g3dZgwO...drive_link.

I have also uploaded two photos to my Flickr account:

The 8930 SE disk structure: https://flic.kr/p/2rFraYJ.

The MR8 completion screen capture: https://flic.kr/p/2rFrk1a.


Here is my incomplete comparison template.  If I need to add more information to the template, please let me know.

Quote:Backup/Check Image/Verify Image Times
2019 Dell XPS 8930 SE Desktop Computer
i7 CPU, 32 GB RAM
DELL GeForce RTX 2060 GPU (6 GB Memory)
Three Internal Drives:
Drive 0: ST2000DM008-2FR102 (ZFL0WX49) [1863 GB] D:
Drive 1: WDC WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 (V30884SF) [3726 GB] G: (Target Image Drive)
Drive 2: SSDPEMKF010T8 NVMe INTEL 1024GB (5CD2_E428_9150_7048.) [953 GB] C: (Source Image Drive)


Common Defaults to all three programs:

High Priority
Full Disk/Partition Images (all 6 partitions)
Source Drive: Internal Intel 1 TB SSD (Disk 2)
Target Drive: Internal WD Black 4 TB HDD (Disk 1)


Macrium Reflect 8 - 2025-11-14 (Times rounded off to the nearest minute)
Disk 2 (6 partitions) Size: 238.27 GB
Macrium Reflect 8 Image Size: 167.32

Start Image Backup Disk 2: 13:53
Start Image Verify Disk 2: 14:07
Backup/Verify Complete: 14:20
Total Imaging/Verification Time: 26:48


Easeus Todo Backup Home [ETBH] (Latest Version) - 2025-11-21 (Times rounded off to the nearest minute)

Disk 2 (6 partitions) Size:
ETBH Image Size:

The MR8 image verification time was slightly less than the total imaging time, by about a minute.  The compression was impressive.

Have a great day.

Regards,
Phil
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: xeroid, 14 Guest(s)