Feature REQUESTS

[xeroid]

[quote="xeroid" pid="11210" dateline="1765123743"]

I wouldn't tell Hasleo, Macrium, EaseUS Todo, Acronis, Aomei and numerous others that "it is suggested not to use all-in-one software", as all of them provide total backup solutions. I'm very familiar with file & folder sync software, as I use FreeFileSync for a particular purpose in my backup process. As I watch Hasleo develop and improve, my confidence in the program is getting higher and higher, so I have no problem using one product for both Imaging and file backups. The suggestion that I gave is part of the File Backup feature that already exists in Hasleo Backup Suite, and actually my suggested improvement exists in a couple of the products that I just mentioned.

What do you think chances of complications arising are between two software doing same task where one is deeply integrated with the OS while the other doesn't even need to install? I am just saying to keep this in mind while using such "all-in-one" software for file/folder backup. There are people who don't even use a single disk imaging software fearing single point of failure & I have seen cases where one disk imaging software failed to restore/work as expected but the other one did. Disk imaging software are not that different in terms of deep level OS integration & still such difference can be there so think about potential differences in similar possible scenarios between such software with a software that doesn't even need installing. In fact I would suggest you to use both FreeFileSync & the software I suggested (it doesn't even need installing so you can test it in just a few minutes) to be on safe side.

[quote="admin" pid="11214" dateline="1765159672"]

Should the option that I suggested be implemented, you technically wouldn't even be required to reinstall Hasleo to restore the files and folders, as they wouldn't be saved in a proprietary format.