Hasleo Backup Suite V5.6.2.1 Released!

[OAStubby]

Good morning,
A clarification: is the Hasleo Backup Suite Professional licence with lifetime upgrades transferable in the event of a PC replacement?
Thank you.

[admin]

Good morning,
A clarification: is the Hasleo Backup Suite Professional licence with lifetime upgrades transferable in the event of a PC replacement?
Thank you.

Thank you for your interest in our product.

We are happy to assist with license resets for reasonable device replacements, such as computer upgrades, hardware failures, or operating system reinstalls.

Please note that each license is valid for use on a limited number of devices as specified. For example, a company with multiple computers would need to purchase corresponding licenses for each device, rather than frequently resetting a single license for rotation. We reserve the right to decline reset requests in cases of license misuse.

Thank you for your understanding and support.

Have a nice day!

[jekovcar]

slider during backup process is not working(displaying) properly in other localization as in English.

[admin]

slider during backup process is not working(displaying) properly in other localization as in English.

Please try resizing the window to see if the issue persists. Thanks.

[jekovcar]

Thanks! That's work fine.

[admin]

Hasleo Backup Suite V5.6.2.1 Released!

What's new in this version:
1. Fixed an issue that caused file backup failures
2. Fixed an issue where system backup did not automatically select partitions on an MBR disk in WinPE
3. Various minor bug fixes

Here are the download links:
X86/X64
ARM64

[chmichael]

do you plan a linux version with command line support ?

[admin]

do you plan a linux version with command line support ?

We’re sorry, but we currently don’t have plans to develop a Linux version with command-line support. We still have a lot of features to complete for the Windows version, and we don’t have the resources to work on a Linux version at this time.

[Froggie]

do you plan a linux version with command line support ?

That's quite a feature request  .  For LIVE imaging Systems to get a "reasonably consistent" (no changes occurring during the imaging process) snapshot of the FileSystem, the FileSystem needs to support that concept.  Currently (I believe) only btrfs and ZFS are the only Linux FileSystems supporting snapshotting capability... and not all Linux Systems support those FileSystems... yet.

It goes a bit deeper than that. The "reasonably consistent" snapshot mentioned above won't really be consistent... especially as far as cached database systems go (most of them).  The full database is pieced together from its cached entries and its disk-based entries... the cached entries will not be part of any FileSystem snapshot.  As a result, the "imaged" database will be incomplete and fractured when saved... not something you want to restore at a later time.  Microsoft somewhat solves that by asking any application that wishes to be fully consistent upon any FileSystem snapshot request pls identify yourself.  In performing that function, the Microsoft snapshot System now knows who to inform when getting ready to do a FileSystem snapshot.  Good actors, when hearing of that request, will make their disk-based important entities consistent by flushing all their cached data out to the disk prior to the beginning of the snapshot function.  This has worked well for 95+% of Systems/applications requiring consistency for their backups/images.  This whole "function" in the new Linux FileSystem snapshotting environment needs to be created in order to develop a similar FileSystem snapshotting capability.

There's still a lot of work ahead for broad spectrum Linux FileSystem snapshot capability.  It will come, but it will take a while.

PS- there's always been good off-line Linux System imaging applications (both Linux & WinPE kernel enabled)... it's just that you cannot run them while running LIVE Linux Systems.

[Gork]

I think using LVM might be the current best way to go with regard to taking a "snapshot" of a current live system in Linux. That might be the best way for a software vendor to come in and create a solution (any possible licensing issues aside.) But, as with changing to a different filesystem, it would require the user to set things up beforehand. And if a user is knowledgeable about such things, it would probably not be difficult for them to simply use what's already available to back up "images" created with LVM.