Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Imaging Performance Testing: MR8H, ETBH, HBSP
Comparison of System Backup with Macrium Reflect V8.1.8853  and HBS V6.0.0.1 Alpha. The ideal comparison would be with Macrium X but I do not have it.

Configuration setting for both
- high compression
- 128-bit encryption
- highest priority

Source for System Image
- internal NVME SSD

Partitions selected
- EFI 260MB, Other 16 MB, System Drive (no data) 155 GB, Recovery 1GB
- source to be backed up 74 GB

Target A
- USB-A attached NVME SSD

Target B
- USB-A attached SATA III SSD

Tasks Performed using the Emergency/Recovery image booted from a Ventoy USB (12 tasks)
- System Backup
- Verification
- Restore


[Image: attachment.php?aid=1100]


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Reply
@Bespoken,

Thank you for posting your results.  They are very valuable to the Hasleo Development Team. 👍

Have a great day.

Regards,
Phil
Reply
@Bespoken,

Thanks a lot for providing the test results. This is really helpful for other users.

Have a nice weekend.

Regards,
Reply
Well, another three weeks have passed, so it is time for me to present my tri-weekly backup comparison results.  I was pleased to be able to test the new HBS version: 6.0.2.0. today.  It coincided nicely with the HBS "turn" in my tri-weekly testing cycle.  I had no control over the timing of that major version release, but I took full advantage of the serendipitous opportunity to test it immediately.

So, without further ado, here we go.



Imaging/Check Image Comparisons


Computer:

2019 Dell XPS 8930 SE Desktop Computer
i7 CPU, 32 GB RAM
DELL GeForce RTX 2060 GPU (6 GB Memory)
Three Internal Drives:
Drive 0 [HDD]: ST2000DM008-2FR102 (ZFL0WX49) [1863 GB] D:
Drive 1 [HDD]: WDC WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 (V30884SF) [3726 GB] G: (Target Image Drive)
Drive 2 [SSD]: SSDPEMKF010T8 NVMe INTEL 1024GB (5CD2_E428_9150_7048.) [953 GB] (Source Image Drive)
No BitLocker Encryption on any Drives


Common Defaults to all three programs:

High Priority
Full Disk/Partition Images (all six used partitions, one partition (7) is empty)
Source Drive: Internal Intel 1 TB SSD (Disk 2)
Target Drive: Internal WD Black 4 TB HDD (Disk 1)
Default Compression (Recommended)
OS: Windows 11 Pro 26H2 (26300.9711), unless otherwise stated.
Recommended Program Defaults, unless otherwise noted.



Listed in chronological order of testing (earliest date to the latest date).


2026-10-16 (Times rounded off to the nearest minute)
Macrium Reflect 8 Home [MR8H] (8.1.8853 [UEFI]
Default Filters

Disk 2 (6 partitions) Size: 257.1 GB
MR8 Image Size: 188.4 GB
Image Backup - Disk 2: 13:55 - 14:10 (15 minutes)
Image Verify - Disk 2: 14:10 - 14:24 (14 minutes)
Total Imaging Time: 29 minutes



2026-10-23 (Times rounded off to the nearest minute)
2026 Easeus Todo Backup Home [ETBH] (18.0.0 [Build 20251203])
Default Filters

Disk 2 (6 partitions) Size: 252.9 GB
ETBH Image Size: 199.2 GB

Image Backup - Disk 2: 13:51 - 14:07 (16 minutes)
Check Image - Disk 2: 14:09 - 14:32 (23 minutes)
Total Imaging Time: 39 minutes



2026-10-30 (Times rounded off to the nearest minute)
Hasleo Backup Suite Professional [HBSP] 6.0.2.0
Default Filters, Smart Backup enabled, Highest Priority.

Disk 2 (6 partitions) Size: 257.0 GB
HBSP Image Size: 177.7 GB GB

Image Backup - Disk 2: 13:51 - 14:05 (14 minutes)
Check Complete Image - Disk 2: 14:06 - 14:19 (13 minutes)
Total Imaging Time: 27 minutes




[Image: attachment.php?aid=1148]


Have a great day.

Regards,
Phil


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Reply
@garioch7,

Thanks again for providing the test results. Glad to see that Hasleo Backup Suite V6.0 has not introduced any performance degradation.

I have a small suggestion: perhaps the software version numbers should be indicated in the table, it took me a few seconds to find them.

Have a nice weekend!

Best regards,
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 74 Guest(s)