Posts: 13
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2022
Reputation:
0
What is the difference between the two software tools
Hasleo Backup Suite vs. Hasleo Disk Clone?
They seem to cover a similar functionality.
Is one a subset of the other?
What can I do with Disk Clone what I cannot with Backup Suite?
Assume I want to transfer the content of an internal m.2 SSD with multiple partitions (with one of them Windows 10) to another (bigger) SSD (which shoule later replace the first).
What is the Hasleo tool of choice for this task?
Posts: 2,803
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
141
(02-04-2026, 06:35 AM)pstein Wrote: What is the difference between the two software tools
Hasleo Backup Suite vs. Hasleo Disk Clone?
They seem to cover a similar functionality.
Is one a subset of the other?
What can I do with Disk Clone what I cannot with Backup Suite?
Assume I want to transfer the content of an internal m.2 SSD with multiple partitions (with one of them Windows 10) to another (bigger) SSD (which shoule later replace the first).
What is the Hasleo tool of choice for this task?
Yes, Hasleo Disk Clone is a subset of the disk cloning feature in Hasleo Backup Suite. Hasleo Backup Suite offers a more complete set of features, including backup, restore, cloning, and some additional functions.
Posts: 107
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2025
Reputation:
6
@pstein,
I would recommend you watch this video for an explanation of the differences between cloning and imaging: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9va6_gn-8s.
Personally, I always create disk images.
@admin has explained that the Hasleo Backup Suite (HBS) can do both, and has much more functionality. I am so impressed with the capabilities of HBS that I purchased the Pro version, with lifetime free version upgrades, to support continued development by the team. Its performance is the best of the three imaging programs that I own, in testing that I have done, and posted here.
Have a great day.
Regards,
Phil
Posts: 2,803
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
141
@Phil,
Thank you so much for your sharing and for your contributions to HBS. HBS is still very young, and we will continue to work hard.
Best regards,
Posts: 107
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2025
Reputation:
6
@admin,
You are most welcome. I am very impressed by the dedication and talent of the Hasleo Team. HBS is now a top contender in the disk imaging software program universe, despite being SO young. Hasleo is now already outperforming much older, established disk imaging programs. That is a remarkable achievement for such a young Team!
It is also highly commendable that Hasleo is promptly engaging directly with its free and paid users on these Forums. I commend you, in particular. No question goes unanswered or uninvestigated. I have never seen another imaging company do that!
It is my pleasure to assist as I can, with my limited talents. Hasleo is climbing a long, steep hill to make its mark in the imaging community. I am confident, that if the Hasleo Team continues what they have been doing, they will succeed and become very successful, despite the many competitors already established in the field of imaging. The "word" will get around that Hasleo deserves a serious "look" if someone wants an outstanding imaging product.
Good luck in the future. Have a great day.
Regards,
Phil
Posts: 2,803
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
141
Dear @Phil,
Thank you for such high recognition and for your continued support!
Yes, we have always been doing our best to respond to every question from every user. However, as you know, our manpower is limited, and replying to and handling user feedback requires a significant amount of time. Therefore, we suggest that users provide as much detailed information as possible when they encounter issues, such as specific error messages, log files, and steps to reproduce the problem. This information will greatly help us pinpoint the cause and resolve the issue more efficiently.
We highly value the voice of every user, and our team will continue to dedicate efforts to make Hasleo Backup Suite even better.
Have a nice day!
Best regards,
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2025
Reputation:
0
(02-05-2026, 04:52 AM)garioch7 Wrote: @pstein,
I would recommend you watch this video for an explanation of the differences between cloning and imaging: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9va6_gn-8sdrive mad
Personally, I always create disk images.
@admin has explained that the Hasleo Backup Suite (HBS) can do both, and has much more functionality. I am so impressed with the capabilities of HBS that I purchased the Pro version, with lifetime free version upgrades, to support continued development by the team. Its performance is the best of the three imaging programs that I own, in testing that I have done, and posted here.
Have a great day.
Regards,
Phil
When using Hasleo Backup Suite for data backup, can you explain the benefits and limitations of employing disk imaging versus disk cloning in emergency system recovery scenarios?
Posts: 430
Threads: 38
Joined: Dec 2022
Reputation:
30
Of course, disk cloning would be the quickest method to return your broken disk to operational status, but cloning allows for only (1) backup copy, no more. If the clone itself is an issue when needed (errors, etc.), you're toast. I'm not sure about Hasleo, but if the cloning process also clones your DiskID (which many do), the cloned disk may not be left active after the cloning operation or the next BOOT will fail due to duplicate DiskIDs active in your System.
The restoration process used after imaging, following a physical disk failure, takes a bit longer (not too long if using a modern SSD). If you're restoring after System corruption (virus, ransomeware, broken MicroSloth update, etc.), the process is much quicker due to the DELTA RESTORE function of Hasleo (restore only the FileSystem blocks changed since the image was taken). Imaging allows you many points in time to restore from, many backup points... cloning allows for only one. If the System corruption you're recovering from was actually introduced before your last clone, you're toast as well. With multiple images that is not the case.
Many imaging users (myself included) keep many previous time points (I keep 2-mo worth just in case)... it makes me feel a bit safer  . Of course, your System readiness requirements may be much different than mine. The choice is really up to the user and their System... does it need to be back up immediately (switching in cloned disk time not included) or can some small group of minutes be tolerated with the ability to have many recent time points available to use for System restoration.
Posts: 43
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2025
Reputation:
5
I always use imaging, period. Even if I'm just replacing a disk for a newer one. If I had a need for quickest restore to service method, I'd consider a clone but a typical, non-business user can easily afford a few extra minutes.
A clone is putting all your eggs in one backup basket. It is definitely not impossible to find the disk with your clone on it has developed a problem with the data like a bad cluster and won't restore. With images you can see if an older one one the disk is good.
@Froggie has listed the advantages of having images over a clone copy.
I don't know everybody's requirements, but I make way more images than I do restores, this is another reason to ignore the time factor.
|
